Comments on: Scandinavian Runestones: Viking History in Plain Sight /scandinavian-runestones/ All Things Norway, In English Sat, 14 Jun 2025 10:22:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: Geirr Gardvord /scandinavian-runestones/#comment-1028539 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:53:35 +0000 /?p=41633#comment-1028539 In reply to Lorns Kappedal Slivan.

The Kensington Runestone (Minnesota) features a curious blend of runes from the Elder Futhark, Younger Futhark, and even some modern rune forms, including characters that did not exist in the 14th century or appear to have been invented altogether.
Most scholars regard the stone as a 19th-century creation, likely carved by a Scandinavian-American settler with an interest in antiquity and some familiarity with runes.
Its linguistic inconsistencies, anachronistic rune forms, and complete lack of archaeological context all strongly suggest a modern origin rather than an authentic medieval artifact.

The Heavener Runestone (Oklahoma) bears inscriptions that resemble Elder Futhark, and may spell out a name or short phrase. However, the carving style is inconsistent with rune forms known to have been used during the Viking Age.
As with the Kensington stone, there is no archaeological context to support a Norse origin, and interpretations remain highly speculative.
While not considered authentic by scholars, the Heavener Runestone has nonetheless become a regional symbol of heritage, celebrated in local Norse-themed festivals and community identity.

]]>
By: Olafr Alexander Glucksberg /scandinavian-runestones/#comment-730266 Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:29:51 +0000 /?p=41633#comment-730266 Do you want to know what the writing in the picture says? It says aer lker, oft, ven. Of course the picture cuts out a lot of words and this is old Norse. It probably is a stroy sign actually. Based of these words it would say vaere which is vaer iker is ikke ofte, often, and ven for venstren. This sounds like some journey one took rarely, such as moving something rare or preparing for a journey of high value trade, furthering the lands development. Interesting article read.

]]>
By: David Nikel /scandinavian-runestones/#comment-729034 Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:13:37 +0000 /?p=41633#comment-729034 In reply to Lorns Kappedal Slivan.

Because it’s an article about Scandinavia!

]]>
By: Lorns Kappedal Slivan /scandinavian-runestones/#comment-728931 Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:05:00 +0000 /?p=41633#comment-728931 why aren’t the ruenstones in the United States mentioned? One being in Minnesota another in Oklahoma?

]]>