Comments on: Viking Women: What Women Really Did in the Viking Age /viking-women/ All Things Norway, In English Sun, 04 Aug 2024 07:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Matt Howard /viking-women/#comment-1020961 Sun, 04 Aug 2024 07:33:00 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1020961 I would have liked discussion about the fact that men were dependent on wool women made to go anywhere. Women raised the sheep, spun, weaved, and sewed the sails. The richest Viking graves found to date have been graves of women. Fabric production was crucial for sails but also was the source of wealth that enabled the Viking fleets to go out in search of more through plundering and trade.

Also, discovery of the tools of fabric production seems to indicate the presence of Viking women in L’anse aux Meadows, suggesting that at some point women made the crossing. Perhaps all Viking women were not quite the homebodies we now imagine. If we look at other periods in history, long before the modern era, we see outlier women passing as men and/or fighting alongside men in battle- women pirates, women soldiers, women in charge of the battles even. I doubt the Viking era was completely free of women who would rather swing a blade than sheer a sheep.

]]>
By: Violet /viking-women/#comment-1018588 Wed, 22 May 2024 21:00:24 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1018588 In reply to Spaggot.

Just so you know, the long clothing the women are “forced” to wear now started in the later 1970’s. I know because my father was in the military and we traveled. I have pictures and remember the women there were in bikini’s and skimpy shirts and shorts in public. Just use your smarter than you phone and look up pictures of the 1960’s in any of the countries you are questioning. Be smarter before you text.

]]>
By: Wayne /viking-women/#comment-1009849 Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:26:02 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1009849 These are all MODERN arguments reflecting modern values and aspirations. How many today in Norway have seen a person slaughtered in front of them in fighting, much less by someone w axe etc using blunt force. WAR, real war, changes every perspective. Go to trenches of Ukraine to find your answer. Vikings were somewhat mentally ill to do what they did, by modern standards, just like wagnerites n some others!

]]>
By: Gill S. /viking-women/#comment-1006679 Sun, 21 May 2023 17:19:47 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1006679 In reply to Edard.

A great observation (some would label you a sexist) but not a popular one, Hollywood has created a generation who also believes in Werewolves, Zombies (the flesh eating one’s) Vampires and heroines that to come to the rescue of their much weaker and cowardly male counterparts) example, Hunger Games. This is nothing to do with fact’s but does set the sad tone for the desegregation of men’s and women’s roles in society. It has absolutely nothing to do with fact’s but does a good job of confusing the roles men and women play in creating a solid foundation on which society and marriage is based. Not to mention it sell’s a lot of books,movies and T.V. series. Take a look at ground combat roles in today’s military, the exception being pilots ,women are limited to support roles, as an ex-military man I am very grateful for them and the lifesaving missions they perform.. These are just facts, it today’s world “truth” , doesn’t carry much weight. We would rather see and hear the things that fit today’s political agendas.

]]>
By: Melissa Weekly /viking-women/#comment-1006576 Thu, 18 May 2023 03:15:26 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1006576 I have read some research papers about the roles of women during the Viking Era. Women of course did play a great role keeping the land basically in order. The women had to make sure everything was in order, farming, food, livestock, food storage, clothing. Women did all this. They did play a major role in the success of the Viking culture.

]]>
By: Roderick /viking-women/#comment-1004887 Mon, 23 Jan 2023 23:44:38 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1004887 The best argument against the likelihood that there were female viking warriors is the child bearing and raising capacity. If a lot of the men from a community are killed, the community population can recover, if enough of the women are killed, the community cannot repopulate and will dissappear. To those who are saying women can be just as deadly, in the end it does come down to the physical, as the saying goes, a skilled big man will beat a skilled small man. The boys started training to be warriors at 10, not the females – that is known, so it’s unlikely that a women could have become as skilled. Just because you know of a woman who beat a man means nothing. The female marathon world champion is 14 minutes slower than the male champion. The world record female 100 metre sprint (10.49) is not fast enough to even qualify to enter the male championships (10.05 to qualify). Lastly, this grave is the only evidence. And all that is, is a skeleton and a few artifacts. We know that weapons were a status symbol. We know that they were placed there by the living (at the time of burial), the motivations for leaving objects with the body of a loved one can be personal just as often as ceremonial. There is no other archeological evidence and no written evidence. The earliest saga was written a century after the viking age ended.

]]>
By: Sherry /viking-women/#comment-1002479 Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:19:30 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1002479 I know this is an older post… but I wanted to leave a little something for everyone to think about. A male lion is way stronger than any of his lioness’ but they are the killers and he is only a protector and breeder. I’m not claiming that I believe either way but I’m saying that a woman could be every bit as deadly as a stronger male. You don’t have to be stronger if you are faster and smarter.

]]>
By: Live /viking-women/#comment-1001280 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 05:25:30 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1001280 In reply to Pablo.

Uhm sorry, but witch burning was in the middel ages, not in the viking age. I think that the vikings did actually appriciate “witches” as they could do healing magic and stuff.

]]>
By: Live /viking-women/#comment-1001279 Sat, 30 Jul 2022 05:14:16 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-1001279 In reply to Edard.

How can you know that? You look more like a fitness man to me, and it looks like you dont know a lot about this, like other persons. I might not work with this, but I’ve read a lot about this, and sometimes i even live as a viking (allthoug “vikings” arent the right word, since that means some kind of pirate, and I dont know how to translate this from norwigean to english, but anyways) and to me it looks like you are just guessing, and that you think that men are super strong, and women can never be as strong as them, but that is nonsense. Actually, we cant know wery much about this, and diffrent sciencetists has diffrent meanings, but I, as a women, belive that it could have been female warriors, as we know about the valkyries, women who were taking warriors who died in nattlue to Valhall, and they did also decide who ro die and who to survive in a battle.

]]>
By: William /viking-women/#comment-999924 Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:54:08 +0000 /?p=40562#comment-999924 The truth lies somewhere in the middle. I believe that there was the odd strong woman on the battlefield and raids, but this is the exception rather than the rule, particularly if village populations contained more women. I believe that these women would have to likely prove themselves capable somehow or okayed by the war party leader. Shield Maidens certainly fought to defend the homestead. Most Women likely did all the stereotypical stuff, tend to the sick, feed and cook, mind the children, etc. That was just the way it was, period.

The ones overly pushing this “equal repesentation” are clouded by the feminist agenda, who want to stretch facts to meet their modern definition of equality and are letting their political point of view alter their perception of true facts. It isn’t “Toxic” it’s simply truth. It is what it is, not simply what you want it to be.

]]>