Is your pet part of the family? Thats nothing new. Archeological evidence exists to suggest that the vikings held their own animals in high even intimate regard, taking them with them on voyages.
Earlier this year, for the first time that as early as the ninth century vikings brought horses, dogs and other animals across the North Sea.

This article was written by Keith Ruiter, Senior Lecturer in History at University of Suffolk, and Harriet Evans Tang, Post Doctoral Research Associate at Durham University. It was first published by our friends at .
The prevailing assumption had been that enterprising viking armies had simply acquired horses (along with other items of plunder) in their . But these findings suggest that the depth of the relationships viking-age people had with animals have been dramatically underrepresented.
But why? After all, the vast majority of people Scandinavian or otherwise living through the viking age relied on farming to survive. Why has it taken so long for researchers to realise that these humans and animals sustained deep, complex, emotional and mutually enriching relationships?
Past societies cared about humans, animals and things . Some humans could be owned, even viewed as objects and valued far less than some animals.
梆紳泭, we use both archaeology and textsto show thatsome horses in communities such as those of viking-age Scandinavia and Iceland could be seen as people themselves, capable of agency and worthy of careful and deliberate treatment.
Horses in human graves
Horses in the viking age were seen as , meaning they were capable of crossing physical and conceptual boundaries, travelling over different terrains, and even between worlds. They also held cosmological significance.
Read more: Viking Funerals: Burial Rituals from the Norse Age
Norse poetry depicts the god Odin riding to the land of the dead on his eight-legged horse . A newly-discovered bracteate or pendant bearing a runic inscription from Denmark might also suggest an association between Odin (or at least someone who identifies himself as Odins man) and a horse companion as far back as the early fifth century AD.
Historically, horse bodies in viking-age burials have been interpreted as , part of the possessions of the deceased in the afterlife, or as status symbols. But these interpretations miss something vital the bond between horse and rider.
Horses have special relationships with their riders, as both have to learn to . In Norse poetry (some of which links to the viking age) horses were a vital part of warrior identities. Legendary poems about the heroes and depict heroes who are almost .

, the horse of Sigurd the dragon-slayer for example, is after his death.
Evidence of partnerships between humans and horses has been found in burials from across northern Europe, from the grand ship burials of and Gokstad, to the of tenth-century Denmark, to the more modest . But horses werent just buried with men.
At in Sj疆lland, Denmark, a woman was buried with a horse next to her, one leg partially overlapping with the human body (above). Something about this human and this horse meant such an intimate arrangement was appropriate.
The woman is thought to have been a ritual specialist, possibly a sorceress, buried with an iron-tipped copper rod and a range of other objects including some knives, a bucket and a small wooden box. A large flat stone, a dog which had been cut in half and some sheep bones, as well as some iron pins (possibly for fastening baggage to a saddle) and a dog chain completed the burial.
At , a tenth-century burial also has a . Like the woman at 啦娶梗域娶棗紳梗娶-勞娶聆餃梗堯繪轍, they are thought to have been a ritual specialist.
But the woman wasnt the only one buried with the tools of her trade. An iron rangle (a metal ring with smaller rings attached to it) was laid on the chest of the horse buried alongside her. When attached to wagon harnesses or bridles, the metal rings would jingle. It is thought that it may have played a role in .
Were these women buried with these horses because they had special relationships? Or because they were sorceresses? Or did being a sorceress entail close relationships with these animals? We believe that, among other rituals, horses appear to have been vital participants in the processes and practices of funerals.
Good to die with, good to live with
Research shows that relationships with horses have a host of benefits, . Its interesting then, that there is a and that young men should . Horses are considered and even in these texts.
The 13th-century saga even depicts a woman who appears to benefit from a medieval form of , finding relief from her ailment by sitting on her horse as it is led around a field:
The most relief was offered to her by sitting on horseback, as 籀r簸r led her horse back and forth, and he did so, even though it was a great pain to him, as he wanted to try to comfort her.
In a time of ecological upheaval, looking to the past to understand the relationships humans have had with animals can inspire different approaches to the present and the future.
Given a granting legal personhood and rights to a river, looking for historical analogies, such as the vikings and their horses, can encourage us all to continue to push for more responsible relationships with the non-human world.
This article was written by Keith Ruiter, Senior Lecturer in History at University of Suffolk, and Harriet Evans Tang, Post Doctoral Research Associate at Durham University. It was first published by our friends at .

Swedish Farm Owners kept notes about the horses that worked the land and their special personalities. My mother’s farm had a single horse named Nora who was constant in her recollections when asked about her childhood. It is so true that the my families of Scandinavia had extraordinary regard for horses and cats, not so much dogs (barking is a disturbance to nature’s realm, the Norwegians have a dog class that doesn’t bark).
So stupid to romanticize peoples that were essentially ignorant and full of parasites. More likely the animals were tools / property that they believe would be needed in the afterlife. The vikings civilization was around less than the USA and were very quickly defeated. A bunch of inbred rogues who would no doubt, if brown, be called a “gang” today.
Put them in their place and forget about them so we can move on and tackle real problems in the world. Sheez.